Saturday, 1 December 2012

Assignment 5: Virtual essay 30%

Assignment 5: Virtual essay 30%


The very first photograph we are going to discuss about was shot by Simon Bruty.  He’s known for his exceptional works in the sport industry, taking photographs when it matters. His photographs express exceptional emphasis in the critical moments whether it be the moment of scoring the game winning goal or celebrating your championship with your family. The picture shown is the victory, the New Orleans Saints achieved over the Indianapolis Colt in the Super Bowl XLIV. This photograph captures the joy and happiness displayed by Drew Brees, and his family. At first glanced of the photo, the audience is instantly able to feel and imagine the feelings of that environment.




For the second picture, I chose one of the greatest photographers of his time and we have discuss about him before, Henri Cartier-Bresson. He had a sharp-shooter’s ability to capture a photographs at the right moment, having precisions eyes for elements of design, and his literate observations about the theory and practice of photography crafted him into a legendary photojournalist phenomenon. Henri started off as a painter, and then progressed and eventually becoming a photojournalist. We could see many of his photojournalistic work resemble his paintings. This picture I feel supports his trait of having the element of design, as you can see the subjects of the picture, and how the picture was taken, such as the angle and distance of the picture to the subject. It gives you a feeling of mysterious to put your own imagination to work.


The third picture that I chose is the fashion photograph. A comprehensive overview of the field, Fashion Photography: A Complete Guide to the Tools and Techniques of the Trade by Bruce Smith talks highly about many of the challenges fashion photographers have to overcome on a regular basis. Smith talks about the procedure to finding and dealing with models, selecting and deploying equipment, scouting locations, finding and handling clients, building a portfolio and marketing a business. He’s best at offering how-to instructions for specific projects and for developing inclusive skill sets to achieve success in the fashion industry. He offers many tutorials such Adobe Photoshop skills in improving raw images with make up in photoshop and many more, these skill sets are a must for any fashion photographers to become successful.



Born in Chicago, Illinois, Andrew Prokos, is a New York City based photographer. Expanding his work to Washington, DC and Europe. He is best noted for his works in architectural, cityscapes, and fine art photography. His work has been widely published in magazines and corporate catalogs.  He documents cities through the lens of his camera by taking photos of famous landmarks and architectures, especially at night when buildings are lit up and glowing like a Christmas tree. Andrew Prokos has one of the most inclusive collections of work made in New York City, which is one of Prokos’s resume highlights.

The final photograph I would like to discuss is taken by Cliff Watts, he’s best-noted for his photo-shoots of celebrities and his works are widely shown, on the magazine “Esquire”. Cliff Watts began his career just strictly as a photographer, but now has expanded his works to motion pictures. He has work with many celebrities such as Taylor Swift, David Beckham, and Mila Kunis, which is shown below. 



Reference Source:
 “Andrew Prokos photography”http://andrewprokos.com
“Cliff Watts Studio” http://www.cliffwatts.com/
“Simon Bruty photography” http://www.simonbruty.com/
http://hariszedphoto.wordpress.com/henri-cartier-bresson/henri-cartier-bresson-diep/

Saturday, 10 November 2012

Press Photography versus Art Photography


Assignment 2: Press photography versus art photography - 20%

1. The main differences and similarities between art and press photography

Press photography is often used to depict an event that the public or the directed audience should know, usually taken to display an important issue that’s happening around them. The photographs should be able to present to audience the same look and feel as if you were there yourself The purpose of press photography is to exhibit absolutely no emotion of the photographer, giving the audience an accurate representation. On the other art photography is the complete opposite; it allows the photographer to express his very own emotions through his or her photography, usually emotions that relate to the photographer. Find mostly in galleries, homes, giving those types of environments a specific emotion based on the photograph. Press photography produces emotions from real-life events in newspapers, on TV, on the Internet and other forms of media that require factual photographs.

2. Is it ethical and acceptable to alter art photographs? Why? Why not?

Many individuals believe that the process of alternating photographs diminishes the true importance of photography. A type of photography that disregards the true meaning of a stock photograph is Art photography. This allows photographers to alter the photograph accustomed to his/her specific emotion of the photograph. Therefore it is acceptable for photographers to alter their photographs

3. Is it ethical and acceptable to alter press photographs? Why? Why not?

When it comes to press photographs, photographers have specific guidelines and limitations to what part of the photographs they can alter. Alteration of press photographs takes the truth away from the photograph; As a result it won’t give the audience a genuine story when it is an issue that concerns the real-life world.

Press Photo by CBC news

Press Photo by Gleb Garanich

Art Photo by Cole Thompson

Art Photo by Scott Specks


Sources:

Anthony Suau wins World Press Photo. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 8, 2012, from National Press Photographers Association: http://nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2009/02/worldpress.html

Senario 5- The Photographer V.S. The Vulture. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 8, 2012, from Journalism In Context: http://caledonianblogs.net/jic09/2009/10/21/scenario-5-the-photographer-as-vulture/

Photography: Shooting The Truth. Module 9.

Photography Art Cafe. (n.d.). Retrieved 04 22, 2011, from Definition of Fine Art Photography: http://www.photography-art-cafe.com/definition-of-fine-art-photography.html



Monday, 15 October 2012

Module 7: Photography and Society



Week 7 Presentation, this week we are set to explore and investigate the works of three photographers, Alexander Rodchenko , Peter Kennard and John Heartfield. We are set out to compare the work of these artists, as well as explore the similarities and difference of each individual. Finally, answer two important questions,

- Did they have an impact on the society and created changes?
- Can photography and photographers achieve something like that?

This presentation is presented and researched by: Wilson Ho; Somar Al Darraji


_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Alexander Mikhailovich Rodchenko (1891-1956)
A Russian abstract painter; sculptor, photographer, and industrial designer who, as an early pioneer in Russian Constructivism, believed that art must serve as an agent for social change.


The great and mighty Alexander Rodchenko was widely recognized for his work in photo-montages, which is simply the method and product of creating a composite photograph. The process involves cutting and merging numerous photographs to create one seamless reproduction. With this in mind, his work portrayed a significant role in the “political propaganda glorifying the achievements of the Soviet system”. [1] “His work is best noted in a magazine called” USSR in Construction”, which widely displays Rodchenko’s mastery of photo-montages.” [1]   Alexander Rodchenko believed using photo-montages added more depth and meaning than just the raw photo taken. "Rodchenko's photo-montages treated photographs as raw footage, suppressing their individuality, collectivising their energies, cutting, pasting, re-touching and re-photographing them to conjure up dizzying visions of the future."[1] As you can see below are some of Alexander Rodchenko notable works of “Photomontages”.









_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Peter Kennard (1949 - Present)
A London born and based photo-montage artist and senior tutor in photography at the Royal College of Art

Ever since Peter Kennard was a kid, he became very interested in art, at the age of 13, he began to draw and paint out the days of his life. Things he ate and did, places he travelled to. This soon became his life routine. As years progressed, Kennard became increasingly disappointed with the absence of candour in his artwork which failed to develop the depth and meaning Kennard wanted to achieve. Kennard was determine to find a way that can put forward more perseverance, something that would bring out the legitimacy in the society. Having said that, his persistence eventually led to the method of photo-montage. Kennard’s inspirations came from both Alexander Rodchenko and John Heartfield. This took him to a level where he created photo-montages directed at political parties to expose the truth to the public. Below are the various photographs that support my point of view.





 ____________________________________________________________________________________________


John Heartfield (1891 – 1968) 
Born in Berlin-Schmargendorf, he studied art in Munich at the Royal Bavarian Arts and Crafts School.
Notable for using art as a political weapon.

John Heartfield explored and used photo-montages to depict the violent and greedy governmental control, the Nazi party and Hitler’s Third Reich had. He took a satirical approach, condemning the anti-semite and the wealthy industrialist who supported the German army."[3] Heartfield used his art to protest the suffering of a country full of starving and forbidding individuals in chaos during the time of World War 2. John Heartfield was later, politically charged and his works of art directed at the Nazi party and Hitler banned, he moved to Praha in Czechoslovakia where he continued his photo-montage work for the AIZ. Below are some of Heartfield notable artwork direct at the Nazi party and Hitler.



 
 _____________________________________________________________________________________________


The Similarities & Differences

Similarities between Alexander Rodchenko, Peter Kennard and John Heartfield are quite apparent and begin with the fact that all of these individuals had an immense range of talent and desire for the visual arts particularly in photography. With all this talent under the hood of these individual photographers, it sparked a whole new genre of photography, called photo-montage. Photo-montage is “the process and result of making a composite photograph by cutting and joining a number of other photographs.”[1] This whole process might be a little too simple, but when used with the proper technique and delivered with an set emotion, photo-montages can be a power tool for an individual to express feelings and concerns. Another trait that brings a lot of similarities between these three was the aptitude of not being afraid to speak their mind through their artwork. “Peter Kennard and Alexandr Rodchenko have both manipulated images to undermine those in power”.[2] Altogether, these three individuals used the same method of art “Photomontage” to dispute issues or concerns they did not believe in. Last of all, their art was an inspiration for one another and help the many art piece they did.

Even though these three artists have a similarities in their use of the photo-montages method, Kennard, Heartfield and Rodchenko all had different styles, different technique, and different methods of approach. Alexander used lots of different angles when taking photographs while Peter Kennard preferred to use lots of different mediums.Each of them uses photo-montages to undermine those in power, but all three of them directed at different parties. Alexander used his photo-montages as “a visual language for the Russian revolution”, while Peter Kennard focused on going after the government and political parties likewise John Heartfield protested about Hitler and the Nazi regime.  

 ____________________________________________________________________________________________

- Did they have an impact on the society and created changes?
- Can photography and photographers achieve something like that?

These three artists definitely had a significant impact on society, enough to create changes. By using the method of photo-montages, they able to instigate people to think about messages they were trying to portray with their art. Therefore causing people to think, realizing what is going on in their society and therefore having an impact. We have always wanted to reproduce the world around us, events that have past, people that have passed away, and mostly the moment that made us laugh, cry, and fill with joy. It began with cave drawings and led up to the creation of photography allowing us to capture these priceless moments we aim to remember forever. Photographs might not have words, but it can definitely create an impact on society causing people to think about what they are seeing and from there individual can realize and construct the message that  particular art piece is convening.


 ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Sources:
[1] Rodchenko, Alexander. "BBC - Photography - Genius of Photography - Gallery - Alexander Rodchenko." BBC - Homepage. BBC. Web. 2012.http://www.bbc.co.uk/photography/genius/gallery/rodchenko.shtml.
[2]  "Political Photography: The Illusionists - Features, Art - The Independent." The Independent | News | UK and Worldwide News | Newspaper. The Independent, 18 Feb. 2008. Web. 2012.http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/political-photography-the-illusionists-782869.html.

[3]  "John Heartfield: Art." Towson University. Web. 2012.http://www.towson.edu/heartfield/art/5.html.


Saturday, 6 October 2012

Photo Manipulation

Photograph Study 1

Edit Photograph

Original Photograph 

A group gathering of me and my friends, not everything that you take with a camera comes out picture perfect, depending on the environment, photography equipment and most importantly the subject you are shooting. Sometimes pictures come out to either too dark or too bright, in this particular photography, things came out a little bit too bright. To fix this I simply lowered the brightness of the entire picture, at that point I notice that one of my friend was not there when the picture was taken, so I took matters into my own hands and grabbed a picture from before of him and matched it in, using the clone stamp tool, to match the background and adjusted the hue and saturation to match both parts together. Finally I cropped the picture to bring more focus to everyone in the picture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Photograph Study 2

Original Photograph

Edited Photograph

A lovely picture of my beautiful dog, she a white golden retriever. This picture would be perfect except that my mom pink slipper was in the background and my body scale was also in view. To combat these problem,     simply cropped it out, but the slipper was still in sight, therefore I had to use a combination of the clone stamp and paint brush to slow paint it out using a low opacity , small brush sizes and constant changing of the colours of different shades of brown, I manage to remove the slipper from the photograph. As a result the focus of the photograph is situated on my dog. 

Thursday, 6 September 2012